Law 81 · Legal Reset
Privacy cannot be solved by copying a policy.
We translate Law 81 and its obligations into owners, workflows, and evidence so personal data is managed inside the operation.
Contact usThe problem
The policy says one thing. Data moves through a different company.
Marketing, sales, HR, vendors, and technology collect data through different paths, with retention and access that are rarely documented.
A public policy without an inventory, owners, or an incident procedure does not show how information is protected.
How we solve it
Legal architecture built as a working system.
Inventory
Data, purposes, sources, systems, and owners.
Legal basis
Consent, notices, and processing criteria.
Operations
Data-subject rights, retention, access, and incidents.
Third parties
Processors, transfers, and protection clauses.
Execution
From legal exposure to a system that controls it.
Frequently asked questions
Before defining the scope.
Which companies should assess compliance?
Every organization processing personal data should understand the obligations applying to its operation and the information it handles.
Is a privacy notice enough?
No. A notice communicates; compliance also requires internal practice to match what was communicated.
Does this include cybersecurity?
Legal protection and technical security must coordinate, but they are not the same. The scope defines which technical controls need integration.
What is delivered?
Depending on the diagnosis: inventory, processing matrix, policies, clauses, procedures, records, and an implementation plan.
Next step
Can you explain where each personal-data set lives and who uses it?
Tell us the problem with context. We will review it and define the right starting point.
Contact us